Theory That I find Most Appealing Essay Example for Free

Theory That I find Most Appealing Essay Theories are constructed to help in explaining, predicting and mastering phenomena. They are made to be as general as they could be in order for a certain phenomena to fit in. But mostly, there is a great effort in depicting what is there in reality. Like how chemists uses theories to understand chemical reactions, how there is an effort to identify which theory is closest to explaining how the universe took place, there is also theories that are used by those studying humans. Humans are the most unpredictable of all creatures. They could deviate from the norms and mores and traditions etc. that is why it is also essential that we understand them and explain why they act such things by using theories. The personality theory I find most appealing falls under the humanistic approach draws attention to the idea that an individual has immense freedom to know which way to take, whether it may be regarding personal growth, worth identified as one’s own or simply self-fulfillment. With this, I further limited my choice of personality theory to Snygg and Combs’ Theory of Motivation. Theory of Motivation explains that there is a basic need in each and every one of us to preserve and enhance our phenomenal self. Phenomenal self is defined as the person’s own view of himself or herself. This view explains a certain behavior by the way it was acquired by a person as s/he goes through his/her life. The experiences s/he gains and his/her conscious mind works on having a certain behavior. This theory does not take into consideration the subconscious mind like Freud does. This theory also explains that a person maintains or pushes for a better personality as s/he goes through life. Thus this makes one fully conscious of what processes one underwent and the effects it did to his/her personality. A person’s view is said to be developed over and over as s/he continuously journey through life but is limited by her/his way of seeing things by her/his previous experiences and the kind of socialization s/he was given upon growing up. Basically, this theory has the decency of realizing that a person isnot dictated by simply wants or needs or emotions or his/her subconscious mind that s/he cannot control what s/he should do. This theory recognizes the fact that a person could choose what to do with his/her life. But this theory fails to acknowledge that a person could be affected by his/her surroundings in making a sound choice or decision. Say, one is definitely against abortion, but growing up poor and seeing your parents crawling on fours just for you to have a descent life, just so you could finish college would give you a dilemma. To think twice whether you should abort that child given your circumstances or push for it despite the laid down consequences. But what is nice about this theory is that it sees a potential in human that just by having the ability to asses ourselves and the previous experiences we garnered we could be able to further upgrade ourselves. Just like a robot that is reprogrammed in a way that suits the present situations and having a wider scope of abilities. I guess, this theory backs up the clichà © that â€Å"experience is the best teacher†. And it gives a little efficiency by saying that we also learn by how we are brought up. Our lifetime is not enough to experience and learn from all the mistakes we could and should commit just to learn something new. That is why we should also learn from the mistakes of others. Weighing what is right and wrong, a perfect blend of emotion and rationality will definitely bring us to the right direction. theory. (2007). Wikipedia. Retrieved June 05, 2007, from Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory snygg and combs. (2007). Brainmeta. Retrieved June 05, 2007, from Brainmeta: http://brainmeta.com/personality/snyggcombs.php humanistic approach. (2007). The Psi Cafà ©. Retrieved June 05, 2007, from The Psi Cafà © A Psychology Resource Site: http://www.psy.pdx.edu/PsiCafe/KeyTheorists/HumApp.htm snygg and combs. (2007). Social-Psychology. Retrieved June 05, 2007, from Social-Psychology: http://www.social-psychology.de/do/pt_snyggcombs.pdf